Suppression of Science and Destruction of the
Environment

Federal Gulf Oil Report: A Flawed Abuse of Science - Gulf Crisis Is Not Over

The federal government's National Incident Command has released it's report on the gulf oil spill “BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Budget: What Happened To the Oil?” The main message of this report – and certainly the main spin it has been given in statements by government spokespeople and the major media is - “it's all but over, we've accounted for most of the oil, most of it's gone and what's left is disappearing fast”.

But the report's conclusions are at best premature, based in many respects on guesswork, and evidence that didn't fit its conclusions was suppressed. The conclusions drawn from the report and being pushed out broadly to the public are wrong. Leaving aside the dangerous implications this report may lead to in terms of governmental policy, this report is itself an attack on and abuse of science.
read the entire article...

BP Attacks Science and Scientific Integrity - Attempts to Buy Scientists' Silence

BP has been caught attempting to employ scientists engaged in (or likely to engage in) study of the Gulf oil spill under contracts that would "...restrict the scientists from publishing research results, sharing them with other scientists, or even talking about them for up to 3 years". In one case, BP attempted to hire the entire marine science department at one Alabama university.

read more:
BP and Academic Freedom (statement by national president American Association of Unversity Professors)...

BP, Scientists, and Gag Agreements (blog from Mike the Mad Biologist)...

Oil's Stain On Science

by Linda Hooper-Bui (from The Scientist - re-published by LibraryThing)

Functioning as an independent researcher in and around the Gulf of Mexico these days is no simple task. I study insect and plant communities in near-shore habitats fringing the Gulf, and my work has gotten measurably harder in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. It's not hazardous conditions associated with oil and dispersants that are hampering our scientific efforts. Rather, it's the confidentiality agreements that come with signing up to work on large research projects shepherded by government entities and BP and the limited access to coastal areas if you're not part of those projects that are stifling the public dissemination of data detailing the environmental impact of the catastrophe. read the entire article...

Minerals Management Service (MMS) Suppresses its Scientists
"Managers at the agency have routinely overruled staff scientists whose findings highlight the environmental risks of drilling, according to a half-dozen current or former agency scientists.
"The scientists, none of whom wanted to be quoted by name for fear of reprisals by the agency or by those in the industry, said they had repeatedly had their scientific findings changed to indicate no environmental impact or had their calculations of spill risks downgraded.
'You're simply are not allowed to conclude that the drilling will have an impact,' said one scientist who has worked for the mineral agency for more than a decade.  'If you find the risks of a spill are high or you conclude that a certain species will be affected, your report gets disappeared in a desk drawer and they find another scientis to redo it or they rewrite it for you'." (New York Times, May 13, 2010)
Except for this one article, news of this suppression is itself being suppressed.  And while the MMS is being re-organized, there is no mention of dealing with this suppression of science and scientists.

Attacks on Climate Scientists - National Academy of Science members publish letter of protest
The letter begins: "WE ARE DEEPLY DISTURBED BY THE RECENT ESCALATION OF POLITICAL ASSAULTS ON SCIENTISTS in general and on climate scientists in particular".
read entire letter...

Defend Science started with the Defend Science statement - a statement from scientists sharply calling out the attacks on scientific thinking and method which unfolded under the Bush administration. Nearly 3000 scientists and members of the scientific community signed the statement, and we raised funds to run it as a paid ad in the New Republic, the Nation, and the New York Times.   join the Defend Science supporters email list...
sign the statement...
view a selected list of signatories...

The Statement begins:
IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY SCIENCE, AS SCIENCE, IS UNDER ATTACK AS NEVER BEFORE.

“The signs of this are everywhere. The attacks are coming at an accelerating pace, and include frequent interventions by powerful forces, in and out of the Bush Administration, who seem all too willing to deny scientific truths, disrupt scientific investigations, block scientific progress, undermine scientific education, and sacrifice the very integrity of the scientific process itself -- all in the pursuit of implementing their particular political agenda. And today this dominant political agenda is profoundly allied and intertwined with an extremist (and extremely anti-science) ideological agenda put forward by powerful fundamentalist religious forces commonly known as the Religious Right. These fundamentalists now have extensive influence and representatives in major institutions of the U.S. government, including Congress and the White House. This itself goes a long way towards explaining why science itself is under such unprecedented attack.

”This excerpt is from the Defend Science Statement. To read the full Statement, click here.

The welcome verdict in the Dover lawsuit over teaching intelligent design clearly does not mean an end to the attacks on evolution, let alone scientific thinking.  In Kansas, the State Board of Education changed the very definition of science to open the door to supernatural causes. What is centrally and crucially involved in Kansas and in relation to the overall attacks on science is a battle over the whole question of the scientific method and whether that is going to be upheld and applied, or whether--even in the realm of science itself--that method is going to replaced by something else, which is antagonistically opposed to the scientific method.  The need to mount powerful and determined defense of science is greater than ever.
Your signature and support for this Statement will make a great difference at this dangerous time in our history.  There are many ways that people can help in addition to signing the Statement, which are outlined here on the website, and we encourage you to send your suggestions and thoughts on this by emailing us at mail@defendscience.com

Search Defend Science!

Scientists Expected Obama Administration To Be Friendlier
"A culture of politics trumping science
, many say, persists despite the president's promises. The use of potentially toxic dispersants to fight the gulf oil spill is cited as just one example". (L.A. Times, July 10, 2010)
To read the entire article click here...

Obama's Stem Cell Policy - Needed Science Banned and Constrained by Christian Fundamentalist Ideology
    Initially, it appeared to many that Obama was truly standing up for science against the backward forces of the Christian Fundamentalist right. But now, the new National Institute of Health draft guidelines for stem cell research have been issued and a more careful examination of these rules and of what has happened and how it has happened reveals a very different story. The truth is that while some changes may be made to open up and fund some forms of stem cell research, Obama's overall policy and moves mean that vital types of stem cell research are still banned and that stem cell research overall still remains fettered by the Christian fundamentalist position that there is something sacred about the fertilized human egg (i.e. the blastocyst, a clump of cells about the size of the period that ends this sentence) which should set a barrier to important scientific and medical research.

To read the entire article click here...

Comer Case Update: Appeal of Dismissal Lost: Dangerous Precedent Set
    The Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans refused to reinstate the lawsuite against the Texas Education Agency (TEA) filed by Christine Comer.

To read the entire article click here...

Texas: Two Major Attacks on Science - State Education Standards for Science Undermine Teaching Evolution
Christine Comer Case: Undermines Educators' Ability to Defend Science

    A huge battle has been taking place centering on what standards for teaching science would be set by the Texas State Board of Education. These standards are meant to dictate what is taught in science classes in elementary and secondary schools, and also are meant to provide the material for state tests and textbooks for the next decade. And the implications of these standards go beyond Texas itself. As Texas is one of the largest markets for school science textbooks, these Texas standards could have a major effect on new textbooks used across the country. The basic, scientific standards that apply here are clear: evolution is true and should be taught as such; creationism in any form is not science and should not be taught in science classrooms

To read the entire article click here...


Join in the battle to defend science!
Funds Urgently Needed!  Our immediate goal is to print in major news media.  Help spread the word to others about the Statement and the need for funds.
make a donation...
You can sign the Statement on this website. Just click here to add your name to the growing list.

Scientists and Members of the Scientific Community:

• Sign and Circulate This Statement.
• Help Raise Funds to Have it Printed in Newspapers Across the Country, and Internationally.
• Get This Statement Adopted by Scientific, Educational and Other Associations and Institutions.

Members of the General Public:

Join the Defend Science supporters' mailing list.  Just click here to add your name to the mailing list.
Reprint and Circulate This Statement, Help Spread the Word, Contribute Your Ideas About How to Wage This Crucial Battle & Join With People in the Scientific Community and Others to Wage This Battle.
• Help raise funds to print the Statement in as many newspapers and journals as possible, in the U.S. and internationally.



One small sample from hundreds of the depth of concern to Defend Science and the broad & growing support for this initiative:

"I am a retired science teacher in Kansas. For several years we put stickers in the front of science textbooks and then took them out the next year. Teaching science we could only say," It happened a long time ago." Teaching the "Big Bang" theory one had to accept that "God created the earth" and as answer to test questions. I had several parents come talk to me about this issue. Basically the teachers still taught the same content and only the parents got upset not the kids. Kansas students were the ones to suffer as they graduated from high school with limited knowledge of science."
--Marion McElroy, retired public school science teacher, Kansas

view more signatory comments...
 

The StatementSignatoriesSign the StatementDonateAbout usLinks
© Defend Science Project 2005. All rights reserved.