| |

Suppression
of Science and Destruction of the
Environment
Federal Gulf Oil Report: A Flawed Abuse of Science - Gulf Crisis Is Not Over
The federal government's National Incident Command has released it's report on the gulf oil spill “BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Budget: What Happened To the Oil?” The main message of this report – and certainly the main spin it has been given in statements by government spokespeople and the major media is - “it's all but over, we've accounted for most of the oil, most of it's gone and what's left is disappearing fast”.
But the report's conclusions are at best premature, based in many respects on guesswork, and evidence that didn't fit its conclusions was suppressed. The conclusions drawn from the report and being pushed out broadly to the public are wrong. Leaving aside the dangerous implications this report may lead to in terms of governmental policy, this report is itself an attack on and abuse of science.
read the entire article...
BP Attacks Science and Scientific Integrity - Attempts to Buy Scientists' Silence
BP has been caught attempting to employ scientists engaged in (or likely to engage in) study of the Gulf oil spill under contracts that would "...restrict the scientists from publishing research results, sharing them with other scientists, or even talking about them for up to 3 years". In one case, BP attempted to hire the entire marine science department at one Alabama university.
read more:
BP and Academic Freedom (statement by national president American Association of Unversity Professors)...
BP, Scientists, and Gag Agreements (blog from Mike the Mad Biologist)...
Oil's Stain On Science
by Linda Hooper-Bui (from The Scientist - re-published by LibraryThing)
Functioning as an independent researcher in and around the Gulf of Mexico these days is no simple task. I study insect and plant communities in near-shore habitats fringing the Gulf, and my work has gotten measurably harder in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. It's not hazardous conditions associated with oil and dispersants that are hampering our scientific efforts. Rather, it's the confidentiality agreements that come with signing up to work on large research projects shepherded by government entities and BP and the limited access to coastal areas if you're not part of those projects that are stifling the public dissemination of data detailing the environmental impact of the catastrophe. read the entire article...
Minerals Management Service (MMS) Suppresses its Scientists
"Managers at the agency have
routinely
overruled staff
scientists
whose findings highlight the environmental risks of drilling,
according to a half-dozen current or former agency scientists.
"The scientists, none of whom wanted to be
quoted by name for fear of reprisals by the agency or by those in the
industry, said they had repeatedly had their scientific findings
changed to indicate no environmental impact or had their calculations
of spill risks downgraded.
'You're simply are not allowed to conclude that the drilling will have
an
impact,' said one scientist who has worked for the mineral agency for
more than a decade. 'If you find the risks of a spill are high or
you conclude that a certain species will be affected, your report gets
disappeared in a desk drawer and they find another scientis to redo it
or they rewrite it for you'." (New York Times, May 13, 2010)
Except for this one article, news of this suppression is itself being
suppressed. And while the MMS is being re-organized, there is no
mention of dealing with this suppression of science and scientists.
Attacks on
Climate Scientists - National Academy of Science members publish letter
of protest
The letter begins: "WE ARE DEEPLY DISTURBED
BY THE RECENT
ESCALATION OF POLITICAL ASSAULTS
ON SCIENTISTS in general and on climate scientists in particular".
read entire letter...
Defend Science started with the Defend Science statement - a statement
from scientists sharply calling out the attacks on scientific thinking and
method which unfolded under the Bush administration. Nearly 3000
scientists and members of the scientific community signed the statement,
and we raised funds to run it as a paid ad in the New Republic, the
Nation, and the New York Times.
join the Defend Science
supporters email list...
sign the statement...
view a selected list of
signatories...
The Statement begins:
IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY SCIENCE, AS
SCIENCE, IS UNDER ATTACK AS NEVER BEFORE.
“The
signs of this are everywhere. The
attacks are coming at an accelerating pace, and include frequent
interventions by powerful forces, in and out of the Bush
Administration, who seem all too willing to deny scientific truths,
disrupt scientific investigations, block scientific progress, undermine
scientific education, and sacrifice the very integrity of the
scientific process itself -- all in the pursuit of implementing their
particular political agenda. And today this dominant political agenda
is profoundly allied and intertwined with an extremist (and extremely
anti-science) ideological agenda put forward by powerful fundamentalist
religious forces commonly known as the Religious Right. These
fundamentalists now have extensive influence and representatives in
major institutions of the U.S. government, including Congress and the
White House. This itself goes a long way towards explaining why science
itself is under such unprecedented attack.
”This excerpt
is from the
Defend Science
Statement. To read the full Statement, click
here.
The welcome verdict in the Dover lawsuit
over teaching intelligent design clearly does not mean an end to the
attacks on evolution, let alone scientific thinking. In Kansas,
the State Board of Education changed the very definition of science to
open the door to supernatural causes. What is centrally and crucially
involved in Kansas and in relation to the overall attacks on science is
a battle over the whole question of the scientific method and whether
that is going to be upheld and applied, or whether--even in the realm
of science itself--that method is going to replaced by something else,
which is antagonistically opposed to the scientific method. The
need to mount powerful and determined defense of science is greater
than ever.
Your signature and support for this Statement will make a great
difference at this dangerous time in our history. There are many
ways that people can help in addition to signing the Statement, which
are outlined here on the website, and we encourage you to send your
suggestions and thoughts on this by emailing us at mail@defendscience.com
|
|
Search
Defend Science!
Scientists Expected Obama Administration To Be Friendlier
"A culture of politics trumping science, many say, persists despite the president's promises. The use of potentially toxic dispersants to fight the gulf oil spill is cited as just one example". (L.A. Times, July 10, 2010)
To read
the entire article click here...
Obama's Stem Cell
Policy - Needed Science Banned and
Constrained by Christian
Fundamentalist Ideology
Initially, it appeared
to many that Obama was truly standing up for science against the
backward forces of the Christian Fundamentalist right.
But now, the new National Institute of Health draft guidelines for stem
cell research have been issued and a more careful examination of these
rules and of what has happened and how it has happened reveals a very
different story. The truth is that while some changes may be made to
open up and fund some forms of stem cell research, Obama's overall
policy and moves mean that vital types of stem cell research are still
banned and that stem cell research overall still remains fettered by
the Christian fundamentalist position that there is something sacred
about the fertilized human egg (i.e. the blastocyst, a clump of cells
about the size of the period that ends this sentence) which should set
a barrier to important scientific and medical research.
To read
the entire article click here...
Comer Case Update: Appeal of Dismissal Lost: Dangerous Precedent Set
The Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans refused to reinstate the lawsuite against the Texas Education Agency (TEA) filed by Christine Comer.
To read
the entire article click here...
Texas: Two Major Attacks on Science - State Education Standards
for Science Undermine Teaching
Evolution
Christine Comer Case:
Undermines Educators' Ability to Defend
Science
A huge battle has been
taking place centering on what standards for teaching science would be
set by the Texas State Board of Education. These standards are meant to
dictate what is taught in science classes in elementary and secondary
schools, and also are meant to provide the material for state tests and
textbooks for the next decade. And the implications of these standards
go beyond Texas itself. As Texas is one of the largest markets for
school science textbooks, these Texas standards
could have a major effect on new textbooks used across the country.
The basic, scientific standards that apply here are clear:
evolution is true and should be taught as such;
creationism in any form is not science and should not be taught in
science classrooms
To read
the entire article click here...

Join in the battle to defend
science!
Funds Urgently
Needed! Our immediate goal is
to print in major news media. Help spread the word to others
about the
Statement and the need for funds.
make a donation...
You can sign the Statement on this
website. Just click here to add your name to
the growing list.
Scientists
and Members of the
Scientific Community:
• Sign and Circulate This Statement.
• Help Raise Funds to Have it Printed in Newspapers Across the Country,
and Internationally.
• Get This Statement Adopted by Scientific, Educational and Other
Associations and Institutions.
Members of the General Public:
• Join
the Defend Science supporters' mailing list. Just click
here
to add your name to the mailing list.
• Reprint and Circulate This
Statement, Help Spread the Word, Contribute Your Ideas About How to
Wage This Crucial Battle & Join With People in the Scientific
Community and Others to Wage This Battle.
• Help raise funds to print the Statement in as many newspapers and
journals as possible, in the U.S. and internationally.

One
small sample from hundreds of the depth of concern to Defend Science
and the broad & growing support for this initiative:
"I am a retired science
teacher in Kansas. For several years we put stickers in the front of
science textbooks and then took them out the next year. Teaching
science we could only say," It happened a long time ago." Teaching the
"Big Bang" theory one had to accept that "God created the earth" and as
answer to test questions. I had several parents come talk to me about
this issue. Basically the teachers still taught the same content and
only the parents got upset not the kids. Kansas students were the ones
to suffer as they graduated from high school with limited knowledge of
science."
--Marion McElroy, retired
public school science teacher, Kansas
view
more signatory comments...
|
|